| What if Congress was about
to decide on something that could mean the loss of hundreds of
thousands of jobs, a weakening of environmental standards and
worker protections, and a worsening of the immigration problem?
Would you oppose it? Would you urge your
member of Congress to oppose it too? If you’re like millions
of other practical, compassionate Americans, I’m sure you
would.
But Congress is about to vote on
precisely such a proposal. It’s called “CAFTA” – the
Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement – and
it will soon be approved unless citizens act now to let their
congressional representatives know CAFTA is bad policy.
For communities of faith, CAFTA may seem
charming on the surface. “Free” trade across borders should
benefit working families in the
US
and the huge number of poor in
Central America
and the
Dominican Republic
, right? Unfortunately, no. Free trade comes at a high cost for
all but the upper-most tier of society – the large
corporations, huge agri-businesses and global financiers with
the capital and inclination to run roughshod over small
businesses, family farmers, and developing economies.
CAFTA is basically an extension of the
10-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement, or “NAFTA,”
which was supposed to raise the economic tide for working people
in
Mexico
,
Canada
, and the
United States
. Instead, NAFTA has been a bust:
- The
Economic Policy Institute estimates more that 870,000
production jobs in the
US
were displaced when a huge influx of cheap imports were
allowed under NAFTA.
- The
trade deficit with
Canada
and
Mexico
ballooned 900 percent, to more than $90 billion.
- Immigration
from
Mexico
, which was supposed to fall markedly under NAFTA, has
instead increased as deep disparities between US and Mexican
incomes and job opportunities continue.
Many in the faith community are opposing
CAFTA because it runs contrary to internationally accepted
standards of human rights, fairness and environmental
stewardship. Workers in
Central America
already work under deficient labor laws, but CAFTA provides
little or no incentive to protect against worker’s rights
abuses, sex discrimination or inadequate labor law enforcement.
Negotiated mostly in secret, CAFTA would
devastate poor campesinos left exposed to subsidized farm
imports from the
United States
. The intellectual property provisions would prevent Central
American countries from manufacturing or importing affordable
generic medications to use against HIV/AIDS and other
devastating diseases.
CAFTA’s lack
of effective environmental protection is especially troubling.
Central America
is one of the most biodiverse regions
in the world, where 70 percent of the forest cover is already
lost. Unfortunately, CAFTA provides inadequate safeguards for
what little remains, or for providing clean air and water for
the people who live there.
CAFTA would also allow foreign investors to sue governments if
environmental safeguards or worker protections hinder profits.
That may compel policy makers here and in
Central America
to simply dismantle those
protections, or risk costly settlements.
CAFTA is opposed by literally thousands
of organizations across the country, including Latino
groups, labor organizations, human rights groups, environmental
groups, small farmers, and faith-based and religious
organizations like mine -- the Washington Association of
Churches.
Washington
State
is the most trade dependent state in the nation.
One in three of our jobs here are tied to trade.
Which makes it even more important that we negotiate
trade deals that are fair, and balanced.
That protect jobs, human rights, and our natural
environment. |